Author: Hojung Cho Ph.D.
Editor: Jeff T. Watson
In BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 15-1763 (Fed. Cir. June 27, 2016), the Federal Circuit issued another opinion on post-Alice subject matter eligibility for computer-related inventions. In this case, the Court found that the claims at issue, which are directed to “filtering Internet content,” are patent-eligible under Alice.
Considering the first step of the Alice test—whether the claims are directed to an abstract idea—the Court noted that this case presents a “close call about how to characterize what the claims are directed to,” noting that, unlike the claims at issue in the Court’s recent Enfish decision, “the [BASCOM] claims and their specific limitations do not readily lend themselves to a step-one finding that they are directed to a nonabstract idea.” Under step two of the Alice test—the inventive concept inquiry— the Court found that the claims contain an “inventive concept” in the “ordered combination of claim limitations.” The Court noted that “an inventive concept can be found in the non-conventional and non-generic arrangement of known, conventional pieces.”
Judge Newman concurred, but expressed concerns about “cumbersome” litigation procedures for separate determination of patent eligibility and patentability, urging a more flexible approach.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.